Yes No Share to Facebook
Adjudicative Jurisdiction:
The Types of Cases Handled Within Small Claims Court Proceedings
Last Updated: August 22 2026
Question: Can a Ontario paralegal help me figure out whether my dispute belongs in Small Claims Court?
Answer: Access Ontario Legal Services can help you assess Small Claims Court jurisdiction in Ontario so you know whether your case should seek only payment of money or the recovery of personal property within the court’s monetary limits, since the Court may not grant other remedies like injunctions or declarations even if your underlying claim involves many legal issues. If your claim fits, the Small Claims Court can still decide “all questions of law and fact” in a summary way, which may make it more affordable and accessible than Superior Court for modest disputes. For a quick jurisdiction check and next steps, call (905) 302-1851 to book a consultation.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
Litigative Subject-Matter Authority
As a more approachable arm of the Superior Court of Justice, the Small Claims Court provides a forum where individuals can seek resolution of civil disputes without the cost and complexity of higher courts. Statutory and regulatory provisions define its subject-matter jurisdiction, setting the parameters for the kinds of cases that may proceed.
Note: Please contact Access Ontario Legal Services by phone at: (905) 302-1851 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
The Law
Below is section 23(1) and section 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, which need careful reading together, including special attention to what is unstated. In particular, section 23(1) states that the Small Claims Court is empowered to handle matters that involve, "the payment of money" or "the recovery of possession of personal property" subject to the prescribed monetary limits. Accordingly, litigation seeking a remedy, meaning an adjudicative decision, that involves something other than "the payment of money" or "the recovery of possession of personal property", such as requests for declarative relief, injunctive relief, contractual rescission, accountings, among other concerns, is precluded from proceeding within the Small Claims Court. With this said, where section 23(1) is satisfied by claims that seek only "the payment of money" or "the recovery of possession of personal property", within the monetary jurisdiction, may be handled, regardless of the subject-matter, by the Small Claims Court. This breadth to handle any type of case so long as the remedy sought is "the payment of money" or "the recovery of possession of personal property", is addressed by carefully reading the legislative mandate in section 25 where it is said, "The Small Claims Court shall hear and determine ... all questions of law ..."; and accordingly, it appears clear that the directive to hear any type of case, meaning cause of action, meaning reason for suing, is imposed upon the Small Claims Court.
Jurisdiction
23 (1) The Small Claims Court,
(a) has jurisdiction in any action for the payment of money where the amount claimed does not exceed the prescribed amount exclusive of interest and costs; and
(b) has jurisdiction in any action for the recovery of possession of personal property where the value of the property does not exceed the prescribed amount.
...
Summary hearings
25 The Small Claims Court shall hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact and may make such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience.
In Maple Ridge Community Management Ltd. v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 231, 2015 ONCA 520, the Ontario Court of Appeal recognized how important the Small Claims Court is for making justice affordable and accessible. Referring to the Supreme Court’s decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, the Court noted that long delays and high costs are major barriers that threaten the rule of law. To address this, the Court explained that the Small Claims Court’s mandate in section 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, to “hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact”, allows disputes over modest claims to be resolved quickly and fairly. With simplified rules and procedures designed to move cases efficiently, the Small Claims Court gives people who might otherwise be priced out of the system a chance to have their rights heard and protected.
[33] The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that access to justice is a significant and ongoing challenge to the justice system with the potential to threaten the rule of law. In Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, at para. 1, the court held:
Ensuring access to justice is the greatest challenge to the rule of law in Canada today. Trials have become increasingly expensive and protracted. Most Canadians cannot afford to sue when they are wronged or defend themselves when they are sued, and cannot afford to go to trial. Without an effective and accessible means of enforcing rights, the rule of law is threatened. Without public adjudication of civil cases, the development of the common law is stunted.
[34] The Small Claims Court is mandated under s. 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, to “hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact and may make such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience.” The Small Claims Court plays a vital role in the administration of justice in the province by ensuring meaningful and cost effective access to justice for cases involving relatively modest claims for damages. In order to meet its mandate, the Small Claims Court’s process and procedures are designed to ensure that it can handle a large volume of cases in an efficient and economical manner.
In Ontario Deputy Judges Association v. Ontario, 2005 CanLII 42263, the Superior Court commented indirectly on the range of matters that may be addressed in the Small Claims Court. Although the case was primarily concerned with the powers and responsibilities of Deputy Judges, the Court noted that they preside over disputes involving subjects as diverse as Charter rights, defamation, creditor rights, intellectual property, estate issues, and medical malpractice. While the remedies available in the Small Claims Court are limited to the payment of money or the recovery of personal property, the acknowledgment underscores the broad scope of legal issues that may still come before Deputy Judges. As the decision observed, the Small Claims Court is the busiest court in Ontario, frequently confronting increasingly complex legal problems despite its modest monetary jurisdiction.
[18] Deputy judges can hear a wide range of cases and have broad jurisdiction over proceedings involving the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, defamation, creditors' rights, intellectual property claims, estate litigation, and medical malpractice, among others. Deputy judges also exercise a form of equitable jurisdiction, which adds to their role and responsibilities as judicial officers. The Small Claims Court can hear and determine all questions of law and fact and may make orders considered just and agreeable to good conscience.
...
[20] Deputy judges carry out judicial functions for large numbers of litigants contesting significant sums of money. The Small Claims Court is the busiest court in Ontario and the court that citizens are most likely to encounter. Litigants in Small Claims Court are increasingly represented by counsel and contend with increasingly complex legal issues. ...
Conclusion
The subject-matter jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court is both limited and expansive. It is limited in the sense that only certain remedies; namely, the payment of money or the recovery of personal property within the prescribed threshold may be granted. Yet within those boundaries, the adjudicative jurisdiction is expansive, allowing a wide range of legal disputes across many causes of action. This balance reflects the statutory design: to provide a simplified, efficient, and cost-effective forum, for resolving disputes that might otherwise be inaccessible to many litigants. By doing so, the Small Claims Court fulfills an essential role in advancing access to justice while ensuring the rule of law is meaningfully available.
NOTE: A significant number of online searches for “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a desire for prompt and competent legal assistance rather than a specific job title. In Ontario, licensed paralegals are governed by the same Law Society that manages lawyers and have the authority to represent clients in specific litigation matters. Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise are essential to this function. Access Ontario Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed boundaries, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and persuasive advocacy to secure efficient and favourable results for clients.
