Yes No Share to Facebook
Roadway Includes Sidewalk:
Involves the Interpretation of Sidewalk As Within Roadway Infrastructure
Last Updated: August 22 2026
Question: How is “roadway” defined in Ontario so a sidewalk is treated as part of it?
Answer: In Ontario municipal law, the term “roadway” is commonly interpreted through the Municipal Act, 2001 (and the definition of “highway”), where courts have found municipal sidewalks are considered part of the broader highway/roadway infrastructure, even though they are not intended for vehicle travel; for example, courts in R. v. Nazark, 2024 ONCJ 76 and Cena v. Corporation of the Town of Oakville, 2009 CanLII 1650 explain that the Act’s “highway” definition supports including the sidewalk (as well as related untravelled parts like boulevards/ditches within the lateral property lines). If you need help understanding how this affects municipal duties, liability, or a roadway accident claim in Ontario, paralegal support from Access Ontario Legal Services is available by calling (905) 302-1851.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
Understanding That the Definition of Roadway Includes Sidewalk
When interpreting the term "roadway", it is crucial to consider the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, Chapter 25, as well as the pertinent case law. Upon review of the case law, it is found that courts have defined "roadway" as including a sidewalk, a boulevard, a ditch, and other portions of the roadway infrastructure despite being unintended for the travel of automobiles. This interpretation was stated within R. v. Nazark, 2024 ONCJ 76, and Cena v. Corporation of the Town of Oakville, 2009 CanLII 1650, wherein each case it was respectively said:
Definition of sidewalk – is it part of the highway?
29. The Act does not define the term sidewalk. The Act does, however, define the boundaries of a highway at section 1(1): “highway” includes a common and public highway, street, avenue, parkway, driveway, square, place, bridge, viaduct or trestle, any part of which is intended for or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles and includes the area between the lateral property lines thereof;” (emphasis added).
30. In my view, this wording supports a conclusion that the sidewalk is part of the highway. Firstly, the phrase “or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles” suggests that the sidewalk is included. Many people – adults and children alike – use the sidewalk when riding bicycles [which are defined at section 1(1) of the Act as a vehicle]. This is true, whether the activity is prohibited by municipal by-law or not. Second, sidewalks are generally municipal property and are therefore situated within the lateral property lines of the highway. Sidewalks are clearly distinguished from the roadway, which is the portion of the highway used primarily by motor vehicles.
31. For example, courts have found that the definition of “highway” in the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 includes both the boulevard and the sidewalk. (see York (Regional Municipality) v DiBlasi, [2014] OJ No 2546; R v Wassilyn, [2006] OJ No 2900; and McQueen v. Niagara-on-the-Lake (Town) [1987], 9 A.C.W.S. (3d) 45)). In DiBlasi at para. 93 the Court found, “If the reasoning of Wassilyn and McQueen is applied to the issue at hand, then a "highway" under the Act includes a sidewalk and a boulevard and must also include the ditch within its parameters. This conclusion is bolstered bysection 44(8) of the Municipal Act, 2001 that recognizes that some parts of a "highway" are untraveled.”
[10] It is long established that municipal sidewalks are considered to be part of a highway. See McQueen v. Niagara-on-the-Lake (Town) [1987] O.J. No. 2416 and the cases referred to therein.
Conclusion
Interpreting the term "highway" under the Municipal Act, 2001, with reference to case law decisions, elucidates that it includes boulevards, sidewalks, and ditches. This comprehensive understanding is vital for municipalities in fulfilling their duties and managing liabilities effectively. Strategic insights derived from legal precedents can offer valuable guidance in related areas, reinforcing the importance of informed decision-making.
NOTE: A substantial quantity of online searches featuring “lawyers close to me” or “top lawyer in” frequently indicates a need for prompt, adept legal assistance rather than a specific designation. In Ontario, accredited paralegals fall under the same regulatory body as lawyers and are empowered to represent clients in certain legal disputes. Core to this function are advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise. Access Ontario Legal Services provides legal representation within its authorised domain, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and favourable outcomes for clients.