Yes No Share to Facebook
Claiming Disgorgement Remedy
Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer
Last Updated: August 22 2026
Question: Can I sue in Ontario to ask for disgorgement of improper profits when I was wronged but did not suffer a corresponding loss?
Answer: Access Ontario Legal Services can help you assess whether a disgorgement (restitutionary) remedy is available to strip a wrongdoer of ill gotten gains under a “profiting from wrong” theory, typically where the defendant committed an underlying legal wrong and ordinary damages are inadequate, such as in cases involving a breach of fiduciary duty or breach of trust, and in exceptional situations where the wrong is a crime, breach of contract, or tort; in Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., 2020 ONSC 6534, the court explains when disgorgement may be ordered and how “corresponding deprivation” can be shown as the gain being made possible by the wrongful act rather than a direct transfer of wealth If you are in Ontario and want to evaluate your options, contact Access Ontario Legal Services at (905) 302-1851 to discuss your facts with a paralegal.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
Can a Lawsuit Claim Improper Profits Gained By a Wrongdoing?
When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.
Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains
In some circumstances a wrongdoer may receive a benefit or profit arising from the wrongdoing while little, if any, loss or harm arises to the victim of the wrongdoing. Whereas the law generally forbid a person from suing unless a loss or harm has occurred per no harm, no foul principles, a valid lawsuit may involve claims for the illegitimate benefits or profits arising from the misconduct of the wrongdoer.
The Law
Disgorgement remedy, as a stripping of ill gotten gains from a wrongdoer, was well explained within the Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, case wherein it was stated:
[19] Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]
Explained Principles
Imagine a situation where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud upon another person. In some circumstances, the victim may experience little harm or was able to mitigate all or most of the harm that resulted from the fraud and thus little loss, if any occurs; however, the wrongdoer may have significantly benefited or profited from the fraud. The law, applied by the courts, seeking to discourage and deter wrongful conduct, may order that the benefits or profits be disgorged from the wrongdoer and provided to the victim. In this way the remedy of disgorgement ensures that the wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and is, presumably, discouraged and deterred from engaging in wrongful conduct.
Summary Comment
Disgorgement is a form of restitution rather than compensation whereas disgorgement is applied in law as a matter of fairness rather than as a means for making whole the losses or harms of a victim.
NOTE: A substantial quantity of online searches featuring “lawyers close to me” or “top lawyer in” frequently indicates a need for prompt, adept legal assistance rather than a specific designation. In Ontario, accredited paralegals fall under the same regulatory body as lawyers and are empowered to represent clients in certain legal disputes. Core to this function are advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise. Access Ontario Legal Services provides legal representation within its authorised domain, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and favourable outcomes for clients.
